jump to navigation

Windows versus Linux.. Again!?! January 20, 2009

Posted by intelliginix in Linux Applications, Linux Servers, Operating Systems, Shell Programming and Scripting, linux.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

linux-versu-win-1Ron Barrett of Network World is claiming that “Windows 7 will crush Linux” because he like other Microsoft junkies doesn’t understand why people (like myself) use Linux. People like Ron are good a stating the obvious stuff like:

Windows 7 installs easier, has simpler configuration of user settings, greater availability of software, blah, blah, blah

Take a look at this one sided article that subtly points out most of the problems Windows has to begin with. Aside from the server operating systems which tend to be lean on a vanilla install (and I am being generous), the more mature Windows gets, the more bloated it gets; The more features it packs, the more resources it needs, and don’t forget the hassle of day-to-day upgrades as well as service pack releases. Mainstream Linux distributions are not oblivious to updates, and have methods of distributing updates as well, but receiving updates in most cases doesn’t depend on purchasing the “Boxed” version of the product.

Windows is including POWERSHELL and that’s great, but Linux has had multiple power-shells since the beginning. So way to catch up there Windows, Microsoft finally understands that scripting is important to the real IT administrators.

Notice that features of the “New” Windows GUI (Macs are guilty too) were simply stolen. A lot of the eye-candy that was implemented in Windows Vista existed for some time in Sun Microsystems Looking Glass, KDE, and GNOME. Virtual Desktops like the Compiz and Beryl project (Logical or 3D) have been solid on Linux for some time now. But enough with the look and feel business. Windows, GNOME, KDE, and Mac desktops can be made as glamorous as you would like them to be, but hands-down you have more options and more control on Linux. You have dozens of window management choices at your disposal on Linux and other UNIX operating systems. I will give Windows and the MacOS credit for being very integrated and cohesive operating environments, but this isn’t hard to accomplish when there is only one entity is setting the rules. KDE, GNOME, and others are cohesive as well, but a lot of the components that are the building blocks for these window managers come from more that one open source project. But as time goes by they are getting tighter and tighter by the moment.

As far as applications go, well I cannot tell you how much money my company has saved businesses by using alternatives to mainstream computing solutions (like Microsoft, Oravle, SAP<, etc.) by using their open source counterparts. These savings are across the board server and desktop, as well as development platforms. Just do some research for yourself, and see what kind of savings you well get if you replace something like Windows server/SQL server with Linux/MySQL or Linux/Postgresql. You can IIS, or Apache, both are mainstream solutions, but one is free. For the most part the former and latter do exactly the same thing except one will cost you more than the other. If it is in issue of expertise or support you will have to find that expertise regardless of what it you’re using if it’s proprietary or otherwise. Some businesses are scared of projects based on open source technologies because they fearful of having support issues, but those of you who are should take a look at companies that use mostly open source softwares like Google, Amazon, and Yahoo which are using open source applications for mission critical services. I bet you they saved a ton of money going this way instead of using proprietary solutions.

On the desktop Linux is close but has a ways to go, but in my view this is to be expected because there isn’t one entity that governs how the desktop should look, feel, and function unlike Microsoft and Apple, but projects like KDE and GNOME are getting there slowly but surely. I also think that a stable full-featured Windows emulator integrated into the Linux desktop will give windows users a better incentive to a the very least test Linux as an alternative desktop. I myself will admit to using Windows, but I use it primarily for Microsoft Office (mostly Word, Powerpoint, and Access), but with Crossover Office from CodeWeavers I can run those and more on Linux with few issues.

linux-versu-win-3

On another note I like the fact that I can pack a fully-functional version of Linux on a 512M USB Flash drive and take that as well as my data with me wherever I go. Try doing that with Windows 7! Or maybe you can even try ReactOS (which is in alpha now).

-Intelliginix

Anyone using SkyOS or eComStation? December 23, 2008

Posted by intelliginix in Operating Systems.
Tags: , , , , , ,
2 comments

I was just browsing around and I came across these and it made me wonder.. Is anyone out there really using these?

eComStation is the successor (I guess) to the IBM’s OS/2 Warp which in its day used to be my favorite operating system of choice. But around 1996 after IBM’s failed attempt to port OS/2 to the PowerPC platform, and not adding key features like SMP to OS/2 that would have allowed them to compete directly with Windows NT right out of box. I gave up on it and made Netware and Unix my workhorse network operating systems. But since then I haven’t seen any businesses use it after 1999 with the exception of some of the Big Blue shops. Is anyone still using OS/2, or eComStation?

SkyOS used to be free, but now it is closed source and you will have to pay around $30 USD to be a part of the Beta program. I haven’t found anywhere I could download even an older version of this operating system, but you can bet I am still looking for it. Although I have never seen it with my own eyes, it looks interesting, however, at this point in the game it seems like this like reinventing the wheel. I mean, does this OS have any real special features? Does it target the desktop, server, or both? It does have some mainstream open source applications that run on Unix and Linux ported to it which is great, but I would just be interested in seeing what it does, and how it performs. I anyone can supply any insight on these two operating systems I would be greatful.

-Intelliginix

Linux On Brazilian Voting Machines November 24, 2008

Posted by intelliginix in Hardware, Linux Applications, Linux Distribution, linux.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

130 million Brazilian voters were turned into users of one of the largest Linux deployments worldwide: the 400,000 electoral sections in all of the 5,563 Brazilian municipalities were running electronic voting machines, and the Linux kernel was running on all of them. These voting machines have been used in Brazil since 1996, and are rugged, selfsufficient low-spec PCs. Technical details about this Linux deployment and implementation are available elsewhere (and more will come, for sure), but I thought it would be interesting to show some pictures and a movie – shown at the source link below – of Linux booting on these voting machines.

Source: http://br-linux.org/english/linuxvoting- machines/

Will Linux suffer under Obama? November 18, 2008

Posted by intelliginix in linux.
Tags: , , , ,
2 comments

This is one to look at.  Since President Elect Barack Obama promises change, and a result of this change will be more working Americans.  Is that going to have an adverse affect on the open source community?  Will they now have less time to develop software and the operating system pieces of Linux?

Change is here!

Change is here!